Guide to accompaniment at Mass (3) Tempi
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:16 pm
I thought that here I would raise the issue of tempi. However instead of writing a lot of stuff of my own I would just porduce a list of subtopics/headings under which people could give their advice.
And of course there is nothing to stop people adding other headings of their own.
For convenience one might divide the subject into two areas:
[1] Choice of tempi?
[2] Maintaining/adjusting the chosen tempo.
Under [1] here are some sub-topics:
(a) How much attention should one pay to past performance practice?
Bearing in mind that in the C19th and earlier it was often slower than now.
(b) Such immediate factors as (i) the size and makeup of the congregation (ii) the acoustic of the building (iii) the place of a particular piece in a given service (iv) the use of a particular piece in a certain liturgical season.
Under [2] here are some other sub-topics:
(a) Clarity - and fixity of purpose - in defining and setting a certain speed.
(b) Methods of direction - conducting (differences between conducting instrumentalists from singers and why - if at all - this should be so)
- techniques of 'leading' by a cantor.
- should you 'direct' a congregation at all?
(c) Notational adjustments to 'trick' your specialists musicians (and yourself) into using a certain speed:
e.g. Substituting crotchets for minims as the basic pulse
e.g. Such things as 2 in a bar instead of 4 in a bar rhythms.
e.g. Rhythmical articulating by such things as 'beaming', changing time signatures, phrase markings and other articulation signs.
e.g. Re-writing the underlying rhythm e.g. switiching from block 4 part harmony to vamp style accompaniments.
(d) Treatment of chant - several different types here:
e.g. Gelineau chant
e.g. 'Bevenot' chant
e.g. Baroque style recitative (used surprisingly often these days cf. Duffy Gloria)
e.g. Solesmes style plainchant - big issue here - switch from neumes to 'modern' notation or some sort of compromise between the two (e.g. tailess dots on a five line stave).
Lots of other issues here to consider, but this will be enough from me for now.
And of course there is nothing to stop people adding other headings of their own.
For convenience one might divide the subject into two areas:
[1] Choice of tempi?
[2] Maintaining/adjusting the chosen tempo.
Under [1] here are some sub-topics:
(a) How much attention should one pay to past performance practice?
Bearing in mind that in the C19th and earlier it was often slower than now.
(b) Such immediate factors as (i) the size and makeup of the congregation (ii) the acoustic of the building (iii) the place of a particular piece in a given service (iv) the use of a particular piece in a certain liturgical season.
Under [2] here are some other sub-topics:
(a) Clarity - and fixity of purpose - in defining and setting a certain speed.
(b) Methods of direction - conducting (differences between conducting instrumentalists from singers and why - if at all - this should be so)
- techniques of 'leading' by a cantor.
- should you 'direct' a congregation at all?
(c) Notational adjustments to 'trick' your specialists musicians (and yourself) into using a certain speed:
e.g. Substituting crotchets for minims as the basic pulse
e.g. Such things as 2 in a bar instead of 4 in a bar rhythms.
e.g. Rhythmical articulating by such things as 'beaming', changing time signatures, phrase markings and other articulation signs.
e.g. Re-writing the underlying rhythm e.g. switiching from block 4 part harmony to vamp style accompaniments.
(d) Treatment of chant - several different types here:
e.g. Gelineau chant
e.g. 'Bevenot' chant
e.g. Baroque style recitative (used surprisingly often these days cf. Duffy Gloria)
e.g. Solesmes style plainchant - big issue here - switch from neumes to 'modern' notation or some sort of compromise between the two (e.g. tailess dots on a five line stave).
Lots of other issues here to consider, but this will be enough from me for now.